Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the more expensive Core i3-4150T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 2511 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-4150T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150T
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 17% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i3-4150T - 177 vs 151 FPS
- Up to 25% cheaper than Core i3-4150T - $165.86 vs $219.95
- Up to 36% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i3-4150T - $0.94 vs $1.46 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150T - 12 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $219.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6070 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
177
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.94/FPS
100%
Price, $
$165.86
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $165.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6071 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150T | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |