Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5820K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-5820K is 123 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i7-5820K - $41.13 vs $429.95
- Up to 90% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Core i7-5820K - $0.18 vs $1.89 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i7-5820K - 54 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5820K
- Performs up to 2% better in Sea of Thieves than Core i3-4150 - 228 vs 224 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 12 vs 4 threads
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
224
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.18/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41.13
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $41.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 186 minutes ago
Buy for $429.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 186 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150 | vs | Intel Core i7-5820K |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2014 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Haswell E |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |