Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 2191 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Up to 94% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - $29.71 vs $490.0
- Up to 94% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i9-10900K - $0.11 vs $1.74 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 54 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 5% better in F1 22 than Core i3-4150 - 281 vs 268 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 20 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
268
95.37366548042705%
Value, $/FPS
$0.11/FPS
100%
Price, $
$29.71
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $29.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 253 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
281
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.74/FPS
6.321839080459771%
Price, $
$490
6%
FPS Winner
Buy for $490 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 252 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1041
59.51972555746141%
Multi-Core
2047
22.33984502892066%
Intel Core i3-4150 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |