Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 1997 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - $41.13 vs $615.0
- Up to 93% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i9-10900X - $0.16 vs $2.37 per FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 54 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 2% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i3-4150 - 259 vs 253 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 20 vs 4 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
253
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.16/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41.13
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $41.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
Buy for $615 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Haswell | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 165 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |