Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 3539 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - $45.0 vs $369.57
- Up to 82% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i7-14700F - $0.24 vs $1.37 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 41% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i3-4150 - 269 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 28 vs 4 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9884 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
269
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.37/FPS
17%
Price, $
$369.57
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for $369.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9882 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150 | vs | Intel Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 20 |
4 | Threads | 28 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
54 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |