Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4005U outperforms FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4005U is 693 days newer than FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4005U
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield IV than FX-8150 - 373 vs 370 FPS
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 15 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4005U - 8 vs 4 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $82.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8150 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 4th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4005U | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |