Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Core i3-380M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 2438 days newer than Core i3-380M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-380M
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 35 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 34% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-380M - 294 vs 219 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-380M - 64 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i3-380M
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2010
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-380M | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Core i3 | Collection | EPYC |
| Arrandale | Codename | Naples |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 32 |
| 4 | Threads | 64 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
