Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2680 v3 outperforms Core i3-380M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2680 v3 is 1413 days newer than Core i3-380M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-380M
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 35 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Performs up to 8% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-380M - 125 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-380M - 24 vs 4 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-380M
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2010
Xeon E5-2680 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-380M | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 12 |
| 4 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 120 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
