Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4130T outperforms Core i3-380M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4130T is 1041 days newer than Core i3-380M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130T
- Performs up to 16% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-380M - 498 vs 430 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-380M doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-380M
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2010
Core i3-4130T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-380M | vs | Intel Core i3-4130T |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 35 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
