Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3220 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-3220 is 91 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Performs up to 1% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Celeron G1610 - 167 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i3-3220 - $37.0 vs $91.98
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $91.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 144 minutes ago
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 143 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
81.14285714285714%
Multi-Core
739
68.11059907834101%
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |