Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms Core i3-3217U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2132 days newer than Core i3-3217U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3217U
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 17 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 4% better in Valorant than Core i3-3217U - 697 vs 670 FPS
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
697
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3217U | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
17 W | TDP | 54 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |