Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the more expensive Core i3-2125 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 2188 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-2125.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2125
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 5% better in God of War than Core i3-2125 - 171 vs 163 FPS
- Up to 28% cheaper than Core i3-2125 - $109.99 vs $152.0
- Up to 31% better value when playing God of War than Core i3-2125 - $0.64 vs $0.93 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2125 - 16 vs 4 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $152 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 173 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
171
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 175 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2125 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |