Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-6900K outperforms the more expensive Core i3-2125 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-6900K is 1731 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-2125.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2125
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 4% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Core i3-2125 - 308 vs 296 FPS
- Up to 21% cheaper than Core i3-2125 - $120.0 vs $152.0
- Up to 24% better value when playing Forza Horizon 4 than Core i3-2125 - $0.39 vs $0.51 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2125 - 16 vs 4 threads
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Buy for $152 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
308
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$120
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2125 | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |