Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 1848 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 15% better in Remnant II than Core i5-7400T - 97 vs 84 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Up to 18% cheaper than Core i3-12100F - $78.02 vs $94.98
- Up to 5% better value when playing Remnant II than Core i3-12100F - $0.93 vs $0.98 per FPS
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100F - 35 vs 58 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $94.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
84
86%
Value, $/FPS
$0.93/FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-12100F | vs | Intel Core i5-7400T |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
58 W | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |