Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 1393 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 36% better in New World than Celeron G4900 - 136 vs 100 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 28% cheaper than Core i3-12100F - $68.02 vs $94.98
- Up to 3% better value when playing New World than Core i3-12100F - $0.68 vs $0.7 per FPS
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100F - 54 vs 58 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $94.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2476 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
100
73%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2476 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-12100F | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Alder Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
58 W | TDP | 54 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |