Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 21 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G6900 - 205 vs 192 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 37% cheaper than Core i3-12100F - $59.99 vs $94.98
- Up to 33% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-12100F - $0.31 vs $0.46 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
205
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.46/FPS
67%
Price, $
$94.98
63%
FPS Winner
Buy for $94.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 205 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
192
93%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 204 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-12100F | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Alder Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
58 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |