Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 3340 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 14% better in F1 22 than Celeron G1610 - 286 vs 251 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i3-12100F - $37.0 vs $94.98
- Up to 55% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i3-12100F - $0.15 vs $0.33 per FPS
- Consumes up to 5% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100F - 55 vs 58 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
286
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
45%
Price, $
$94.98
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for $94.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4643 minutes ago
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4642 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-12100F | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Alder Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
58 W | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |