Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G4500 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G4500 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 1703 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G4500.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 7% better in F1 22 than Pentium G4500 - 278 vs 259 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4500 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4500
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $85.09 vs $120.0
- Up to 23% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i3-10320 - $0.33 vs $0.43 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 51 vs 65 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 117 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
259
93%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
100%
Price, $
$85.09
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $85.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 117 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Pentium G4500 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Pentium |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |