Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10300 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-5820K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10300 is 2068 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-5820K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Performs up to 6% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-5820K - 178 vs 168 FPS
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i7-5820K - $199.06 vs $429.95
- Up to 56% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-5820K - $1.12 vs $2.56 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-5820K - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5820K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10300 - 12 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
178
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.12/FPS
100%
Price, $
$199.06
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $199.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 169 minutes ago
Buy for $429.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10300 | vs | Intel Core i7-5820K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2014 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell E |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |