Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 298 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Up to 50% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900X - $199.06 vs $395.0
- Up to 47% better value when playing Apex Legends than Ryzen 9 3900X - $0.71 vs $1.35 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900X - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 4% better in Apex Legends than Core i3-10300 - 293 vs 281 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10300 - 24 vs 8 threads
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
281
95%
Value, $/FPS
$0.71/FPS
100%
Price, $
$199.06
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $199.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2178 minutes ago
Buy for $395 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2179 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |