Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - $199.06 vs $696.98
- Up to 67% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-13700K - $1.04 vs $3.18 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 15% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-10300 - 219 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10300 - 24 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
191
87%
Value, $/FPS
$1.04/FPS
100%
Price, $
$199.06
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $199.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2569 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
219
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.18/FPS
32%
Price, $
$696.98
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for $696.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2569 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10300 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |