Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1620 outperforms Celeron G530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1620 is 456 days newer than Celeron G530.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Performs up to 1% better in Stray than Celeron G530 - 176 vs 175 FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Celeron G530 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G530
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G530 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
