Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5650U outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-5650U is 818 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5650U
- Performs up to 6% better in F1 22 than Celeron G1620 - 266 vs 250 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 15 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i7-5650U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i7-5650U |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 1st, 2015 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel BGA 1168 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 55 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 6000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
