Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4130T outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4130T is 272 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130T
- Performs up to 2% better in Metro Exodus than Celeron G1620 - 142 vs 139 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
Metro Exodus
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i3-4130T |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |