Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3550H outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3550H is 2225 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
- Performs up to 3% better in Valheim than Celeron G1620 - 195 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3550H |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 6th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | No |