Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700U is 2225 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
- Performs up to 2% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Celeron G1620 - 302 vs 296 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 15 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Ryzen 7 3700U
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3700U |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 6th, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 55 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 10 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
