Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Celeron G530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 2125 days newer than Celeron G530.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G530
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 13% better in Dota 2 than Celeron G530 - 184 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G530 - 64 vs 2 threads
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Celeron G530
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G530 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | EPYC |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Naples |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 32 |
| 2 | Threads | 64 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
