Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2667 v3 outperforms Celeron G530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2667 v3 is 1100 days newer than Celeron G530.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G530
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 65 vs 135 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
- Performs up to 10% better in Lost Ark than Celeron G530 - 240 vs 219 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G530 - 8 vs 2 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron G530
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G530 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Celeron | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 135 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
