Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G4900 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3930K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2332 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3930K.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 1% better in Minecraft than Core i7-3930K - 619 vs 614 FPS
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i7-3930K - $68.02 vs $280.0
- Up to 76% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i7-3930K - $0.11 vs $0.46 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i7-3930K - 54 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3930K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3930K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
619
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.11/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13421 minutes ago
Buy for $280 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13421 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i7-3930K |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 14th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |