Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G3930T outperforms the more expensive Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G3930T is 1492 days newer than the more expensive Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Performs up to 30% better in League of Legends than Celeron G1620 - 61 vs 47 FPS
- Up to 20% cheaper than Celeron G1620 - $39.0 vs $49.0
- Up to 38% better value when playing League of Legends than Celeron G1620 - $0.64 vs $1.04 per FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 35 vs 55 Watts
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
61
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2528 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
47
77.04918032786885%
Value, $/FPS
$1.04/FPS
61.53846153846154%
Price, $
$49
79%
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2525 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
74.63503649635037%
Multi-Core
723
76.26582278481013%
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |