Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930T outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930T is 1910 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Performs up to 1% better in Metro Exodus than FX-6100 - 140 vs 139 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 24% cheaper than Celeron G3930T - $29.65 vs $39.0
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 6 vs 2 threads
Metro Exodus
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65762 minutes ago
Buy for $29.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65762 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |