Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930T outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G3930T is 1583 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Performs up to 1% better in Lost Ark than Core i3-3240T - 226 vs 223 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 34% cheaper than Celeron G3930T - $25.7 vs $39.0
- Up to 29% better value when playing Lost Ark than Celeron G3930T - $0.12 vs $0.17 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18768 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
223
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
Price, $
$25.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18769 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Core i3-3240T |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |