Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-2500 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-2500 is 2186 days older than the more expensive Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i5-2500 - 35 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield V than Celeron G3930T - 212 vs 210 FPS
- Up to 36% cheaper than Celeron G3930T - $24.95 vs $39.0
- Up to 37% better value when playing Battlefield V than Celeron G3930T - $0.12 vs $0.19 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18822 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
212
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
Price, $
$24.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $24.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18822 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Core i5-2500 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |