Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G is 1295 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 89% cheaper than Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G - $39.0 vs $345.85
- Up to 87% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G - $0.34 vs $2.56 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
- Performs up to 16% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G3930T - 135 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 16 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
FPS
135
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.56/FPS
13%
Price, $
$345.85
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for $345.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 72 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Renoir |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | No |