Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G3900 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-920 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G3900 is 2479 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-920.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 7% better in Starfield than Core i7-920 - 46 vs 43 FPS
- Up to 22% cheaper than Core i7-920 - $70.0 vs $90.0
- Up to 27% better value when playing Starfield than Core i7-920 - $1.52 vs $2.09 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i7-920 - 51 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-920 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
46
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.52/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i7-920 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 17th, 2008 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Bloomfield |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |