Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2276M outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2276M is 2368 days newer than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610T
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2276M - 35 vs 45 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Performs up to 32% better in Rust than Celeron G1610T - 197 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610T - 12 vs 2 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G1610T
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Xeon E-2276M
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610T | vs | Intel Xeon E-2276M |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | May 29th, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Xeon E |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
