Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2276M outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2276M is 2705 days newer than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B815
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2276M - 35 vs 45 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Performs up to 17% better in Valorant than Celeron B815 - 781 vs 667 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B815 - 12 vs 2 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron B815
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Xeon E-2276M
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B815 | vs | Intel Xeon E-2276M |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | May 29th, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Xeon E |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 12 |
| 1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
