Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2880 days newer than Celeron B815.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 8% better in Apex Legends than Celeron B815 - 268 vs 249 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B815 - 4 vs 2 threads
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron B815
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B815 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Athlon |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 35 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
