Key Differences
In short — Core i5-2500K outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-2500K is 161 days older than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than Intel Core i5-2500K - 17 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500K
- Performs up to 8% better in Ready or Not than Celeron 847 - 241 vs 223 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 4 vs 2 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron 847
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Core i5-2500K
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | Intel Core i5-2500K |
|---|---|---|
Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
