Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 2767 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 15 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 19% better in The Last of Us Part I than Celeron 3205U - 150 vs 126 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 32 vs 2 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron 3205U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Core i9-13900K
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 24 |
| 2 | Threads | 32 |
| 1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 15.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
