Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 2941 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 26% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 156 vs 124 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 85 vs 125 Watts
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i9-13900K
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900K | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Haswell-E |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 85 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
