Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 2990 days newer than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 22% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-4160T - 195 vs 160 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 35 vs 125 Watts
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Core i9-13900K
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900K | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 125 W | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
