Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 674 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than Intel Celeron G3930 - 15 vs 51 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 9% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Celeron 3205U - 462 vs 424 FPS
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
462
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.14/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.92
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $63.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Broadwell | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |