Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 184 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 15 vs 51 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 5% better in Resident Evil 4 than Celeron 3205U - 158 vs 151 FPS
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
158
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4155 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Broadwell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |