Key Differences
In short — Pentium G640 outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G640 is 1001 days older than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Pentium G640 - 15 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Pentium G640
- Performs up to 1% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Celeron 3205U - 162 vs 161 FPS
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jun 3rd, 2012
FPS
162
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$30
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $30 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jun 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | Intel Pentium G640 |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 3rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
Broadwell | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |