Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Pentium G640 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Pentium G640 is 183 days older than the more expensive Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G640
- Performs up to 1% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G1610 - 118 vs 117 FPS
- Up to 19% cheaper than Celeron G1610 - $30.0 vs $37.0
- Up to 22% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G1610 - $0.25 vs $0.32 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Pentium G640 - 55 vs 65 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 3rd, 2012
FPS
118
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$30
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $30 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G640 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Jun 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |