Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4160T outperforms Celeron 1007U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4160T is 547 days newer than Celeron 1007U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1007U
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than Intel Core i3-4160T - 17 vs 35 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Performs up to 1000% better in Cities: Skylines II than Celeron 1007U - 11 vs 1 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1007U - 4 vs 2 threads
Cities: Skylines II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron 1007U
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1007U | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
17 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 15.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
