Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4800MQ outperforms Celeron 1007U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4800MQ is 99 days newer than Celeron 1007U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1007U
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i7-4800MQ - 17 vs 47 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4800MQ
- Performs up to 9% better in No Man's Sky than Celeron 1007U - 167 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1007U - 8 vs 2 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron 1007U
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Core i7-4800MQ
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1007U | vs | Intel Core i7-4800MQ |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket G3 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 47 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 15.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
