Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Celeron 1007U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 1621 days newer than Celeron 1007U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1007U
- Consumes up to 91% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 17 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 8% better in F1 22 than Celeron 1007U - 264 vs 245 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1007U - 64 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron 1007U
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1007U | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | EPYC |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Naples |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 32 |
| 2 | Threads | 64 |
| 1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 15.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
