Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-12700 is 1210 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 7% cheaper than Core i7-12700 - $225.1 vs $240.99
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-12700 - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700
- Performs up to 11% better in Ready or Not than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 290 vs 262 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
262
90.3448275862069%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
$225.1
100%
Buy for $225.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
Buy for $240.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
1274
55.56040122110771%
Multi-Core
7454
69.14656771799629%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i7-12700 |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Colfax | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |